






General Motors President Mark Reuss recently opened up about three vehicle models he believes should not have been discontinued: the Cadillac CT6, Chevy Bolt, and GM EV1. These decisions, often driven by market dynamics such as diminishing demand, financial viability, and evolving consumer preferences, led to the premature demise of these vehicles. Among the three, only the Chevy Bolt is poised for a comeback, albeit in a modified crossover configuration. The conversation highlights the complex considerations automakers face when balancing innovation, market response, and long-term strategic goals.
In a revealing podcast discussion featured by Inside EVs, General Motors President Mark Reuss candidly shared his thoughts on three models from the company's past that he wished had continued their production run. The vehicles in question are the Cadillac CT6, the Chevrolet Bolt, and the pioneering GM EV1.
The Chevrolet Bolt EV, a compact and economically priced electric vehicle, was the most recent to be phased out, with its production ceasing in 2023. Although a replacement has since been announced, it will return as a crossover, departing from its original hatchback design. The initial discontinuation was largely attributed to GM's plans to reconfigure its Orion Township facility for the production of electric trucks, such as the Chevy Silverado EV and GMC Sierra EV. However, a series of battery-related fire incidents associated with the Bolt also played a significant role in its early retirement.
Reuss lamented the decision to halt Bolt production, stating, \u201cI wish we didn\u2019t have to do that.\u201d He similarly expressed regret over the end of the Cadillac CT6. Unlike the Bolt, the Cadillac CT6, a luxury sedan intended to compete with models like the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, has no immediate successor in the U.S. market, leaving a void in Cadillac\u2019s premium sedan lineup. The luxury sedan segment has seen a decline in popularity, which contributed to the CT6\u2019s struggles.
Perhaps the most unexpected model mentioned by Reuss was the GM EV1, an electric car produced between 1996 and 1999. Reuss, who was not yet with the company during the EV1\u2019s brief existence, acknowledged its significance, calling it \u201cquite a car.\u201d Despite receiving positive feedback from customers, the EV1 was ultimately deemed unprofitable, leading to its cancellation. At the time, its range was limited to approximately 80 miles, a stark contrast to today's EV capabilities. Nevertheless, the EV1 represented an early and ambitious step into electric mobility, and its early termination is seen by some as a missed opportunity for GM to gain a more substantial head start in the electric vehicle revolution.
Despite these past decisions, GM has demonstrated its commitment to the EV market, currently holding the position of the second-largest electric vehicle brand in the United States, largely propelled by the success of models like the affordable Chevy Equinox EV.
This discussion serves as a powerful reminder of the delicate balance automotive manufacturers must strike between market demand, profitability, and foresight. While the CT6's discontinuation had a comparatively minor impact due to shifting consumer preferences away from large luxury sedans, the premature end of the EV1 might have cost GM valuable early momentum in the EV sector. Even the Bolt, while returning, loses its identity as an accessible compact hatchback, evolving instead into a crossover, reflecting the constant adaptation required in a rapidly changing industry. These historical choices underscore how business decisions, influenced by immediate profitability and evolving tastes, can shape the trajectory of a company's product line and its future standing in the market.








